April 8, 2000
-
4) The Doctrine of Actual Atonement
The Doctrine of Actual Atonement, Part 1
Selected Scriptures
Well, how many of you have always wanted to go to seminary? You're about to go tonight. I'm going to challenge your thinking a little bit as we talk about this issue of the question, "For whom did Christ die?" We have been looking over the last number of weeks at some very important doctrines, the doctrine of perseverance, or the preservation of the saints; the doctrine of sovereign election in salvation. We have looked at the doctrine of total or absolute inability, that is the depravity of the sinner which renders it impossible for him to respond to the gospel. And tonight I want to talk to you about what I've chosen to call, trying to give it a more accurate name, the doctrine of actual atonement...the doctrine of actual atonement.
Now you need to understand that these doctrines that we're talking about are at the very heart and soul of our theology. They are the very doctrines that were dealt with in the great Reformation and rescued out of the darkness of Roman Catholicism. Now it may seem obvious to most Christians for whom Christ died, but it is because we tend to take things at a rather superficial level and not think about them deeply, and thus we miss the very essence of some of these glorious truths that we need to dig a little more deeply. And I'm going to try to do that tonight and obviously the preliminaries took a long time and rightly so, those were wonderful testimonies and a great time of singing. So I'm sure this is going to spill over to next week, so please, I'm going to leave you hanging a little bit tonight and I know many of you are going to rush me afterwards with all your questions of things I didn't cover. But if you'll hold it until next Sunday night, we'll...we'll get there.
Let's begin in a simple way, and I hope this is clear to you. You know, as I tell young preachers, it's...it's very easy to be hard to understand, that's really easy. All you have to do is not know what you're talking about, nobody else will either. And somebody might say, "Well it was too deep," but it might have been only an illusion that it was too deep, it was just that he didn't understand it so how could you. It's hard to be clear. To be clear you have to really understand the subject and work hard to get it to an understandable way, and understandable format. And that's what I've tried to do and I hope it's clear to you.
But let's start with some simple things. If I ask the average Christian for whom did Christ die? The traditional answer would be, "Everybody...everybody, Christ died for the whole world, He died for all sinners." And most people then in the church believe, and I'm sure many people outside the true church, many people associated with Christianity, believe that on the cross Jesus paid the debt of sin for everyone because He loves everyone and He wants everyone to be saved." That's pretty much the common evangelical view. Jesus died for everybody, He paid the price for the sins of everybody. And all we have to do is tell sinners that He loves them so much that He paid the price and He wants them to be saved and all they have to do is respond.
Now if that is true, then on the cross Jesus accomplished a potential salvation...not an actual one. That is, sinners have all had their sins atoned for potentially and it's not actual until they activate it by their faith. So, what we need to do is to tell sinners that they need to pick up the salvation that's already been purchased for them. Since Christ died for everybody, everybody therefore can be saved, it's just a matter of them coming to receive that salvation. And so, our responsibility is to convince people to come and take the salvation that's been provided for them, to convince them to come and accept the gift. This is so deep in the fabric of evangelical theology that the most popular book on the church currently, The Purpose Driven Church, in it the author says, quote, "I can lead anyone to Christ if I find the key to that person's heart." The assumption is that if you can just figure out the technique of getting to some emotional point, you can win anybody on the planet to Christ because, after all, He's died for all of them. That's the popular idea. And I know many of you are thinking, "Well...well it seems to me that that's what I've always believed in, that's what I've been taught." Well we may be taking you some places you've never gone before, but that's good. That's the popular idea.
The fallout of that would be like this. Hell is full of people for whom Christ died. I'll say it another way. Hell is full of people whose sins were paid for in full on the cross. That's a little more disturbing when you say it like that, isn't it? Another way to say it would be that the Lake of Fire which burns forever with fire and brimstone is filled with eternally damned people whose sins Christ fully atoned for on the cross. God's wrath was satisfied by Christ's atonement on behalf of those people who will forever stay in hell.
Now by the way, heaven will also be populated by the souls of those for whom Christ died. So Christ did exactly the same thing for the occupants of hell as He did for the occupants of heaven. That makes the question a little more disturbing. The only difference is the people in heaven accepted the gift, the people in hell rejected it. That's pretty much the traditional evangelical view. But it just sound strange when you start to kind of pick it apart a little bit, doesn't it? That Jesus died and paid in full the penalty for the sins of the damned and died and paid in full the penalty for the sins of the glorified, that Jesus did the same thing for the occupants of hell that He did for the occupants of heaven and the only difference hinges on the sinner's choice? That is to say the death of Jesus Christ then is not an actual atonement, it is only a potential atonement. He really did not purchase salvation for anyone in particular. He only removed some kind of barrier to make it possible for sinners to choose to be saved.
So the message then, the typical evangelical message, is to sinners, "God loves you so much He sent His Son who paid in full the penalty for your sins and won't you respond to that love and not disappoint God and accept the gift and let Him save you since He already paid in full the price for your sins?" The final decision is up to the sinner.
And it kind of carries the notion that God loves you so much, you're so special, He gave His Son and He paid in full the penalty for your sins and that's suppose to move you emotionally to love Him back and accept this gift. And so you kind of work the sinner and kind of manipulate the sinner in that direction trying to find a psychological point, a felt-need point, play the right organ music, sing the right invitation hymn. You know, grease the slide and get him moving in the direction of making the choice.
Now you've got a problem here, folks. We've got a big problem. We saw in our last study that no sinner on his own can make that choice, right? This is the doctrine of absolute inability. He can't make it. He cannot make that choice. All people...all people are sinners and all sinners are dead in their trespasses and sins. All of them are alienated from the life of God. All do only evil continually. All are unwilling and unable to understand, to repent and to believe, all have darkened minds, blinded by sin and Satan, all have hearts that are full of evil, all are wicked, desperately wicked. All desire only the will of their father who is Satan, all of them are unable to seek God, they are all trapped in absolute inability and unwillingness.
So how then can the sinner make the choice? I don't care what felt need you might find. I don't care what you might think you see, quote/unquote, in his heart that will let you lead anyone to Christ, I don't care how many invitation verses you sing or how much organ music or mood music you play to try to induce some kind of response, the sinner on his own cannot understand, cannot repent, and cannot believe. Remember what we saw in John 1? To as many as believed He gave the authority, the right to become children of God but not by the will of man or the will of the flesh. Ephesians 2:8 and 9, "By grace are you saved through faith but that not of yourselves." It is through Him that you are in Christ, 1 Corinthians 1:30, salvation is from God. We saw that. He has to give life to the dead. He has to give sight to the blind. He has to give hearing to the deaf. He has to give understanding to the ignorant. He has to give repentance to those who love sin. He has to give faith to those who can't believe. He has to move the heart to seek Him who otherwise would not. So that all the elements that caused the sinner to come to Christ are God-ordained and God-induced.
And as we have learned, the doctrine of absolute inability means that people will only be saved if God saves them, and therefore salvation is based upon the decree of God, the sovereign doctrine of election. No one could be saved unless God saved him and God saves those whom He chooses to save. You cannot expect the sinner on his own, no matter how he's emotionally prodded or psychologically prodded, no matter how he's threatened, no matter what you say to him, on his own you cannot expect him to quote/unquote decide for Christ. Those who will come to Christ are those whom the Father draws and the Father gives to the Son because He's chosen to do so.
Now with that in mind, looking back at those doctrines, the doctrine of election, the doctrine of absolute inability, we can ask the question again...for whom did Christ die? Did He die a death that is a potential salvation for everyone and therefore on the largest part it was useless? Or did He die a death that is an actual atonement, not a potential one? For those who would believe because God calls them and God grants them repentance and faith, because God in eternity past chose them?
Well the only answer to the question that makes any real sense is that Jesus Christ died and paid in full the penalty for the sins of all who would ever believe so that His atonement is an actual atonement and not a potential one that can be disregarded. If Jesus actually paid in full the penalty for your sins, you're not going to go to hell, that would be double jeopardy.
Now someone is going to say, "Well wait a minute. That sounds like limited atonement." You say the word "limited atonement" and people's antennas go up because we're used to that kind of evangelical idea that Jesus paid the sins in full, paid the price for the sins in full of everybody. But that is fraud with so many obvious problems. But that's what the evangelical church believes and that's why it uses manipulation to move people emotionally and according to felt needs and by what other means it might come up with, believing that the penalty is paid in full for everybody so that most of the people that Jesus died for are in hell. Then what in the world kind of atonement did He provide for them?
And so you say, "You must believe the atonement is limited." Of course, so do you. You say, "I believe in an unlimited atonement." Well then you must be a universalist. A universalist believes that everybody's going to heaven, there is no hell. Everybody is going to heaven. And that's consistent. If you believe that Jesus paid in full the penalty for all the sins of all the people who ever lived, then you have to be a universalist. But we know better than that. We know the atonement is limited. We know not everybody is going to heaven. To be a universalist you have to ignore Scripture. So let's...let me give you just a handful of points, okay? Let's see how far we go.
Number one, the atonement is limited. And by atonement I mean the sacrifice of Christ by which He paid the penalty for sin. The atonement is limited. Now let's look at this at just some obvious passages. Matthew 10...Matthew chapter 10 and I'm not going to wait for you, so you might want to write these down. Matthew 10:28, we've got to go, verse 28, gird up your loins, here we go, Matthew 10:28, "Do not fear...do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul, but rather fear him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." That's also quoted in Luke 12 as we've been learning. There is a hell and God is going to send people there. That tells me the atonement is limited. There is a hell and God is going to send people there.
In Mark chapter 9, and these are just samples that tell us that the atonement is certainly limited. In Mark 9 verse 43, "If your hand causes you stumble, cut it off. It's better for you to enter the life crippled than having your two hands to go into hell into the unquenchable fire." And some texts says, "where the worm doesn't die and the fire is not quenched." Again, another reference to hell. Verse 48 again repeats verse 47 and 48, "If your eye causes you to stumble, cast it out, better to enter the Kingdom of God with one eye than having two eyes to be cast into hell where the worm doesn't die and the fire is not quenched." You come, as I noted, to the gospel of Luke chapter 12, you have the same statement as in Matthew 10:28, but go to the gospel of John and I just want to take you sort of briefly to this gospel and a few glimpses of the obvious reality of the atonement being limited.
It is limited. Chapter 8 makes it very clear. Chapter 8 verse 12, "I am the light of the world," Jesus said, "he who follows Me shall not walk in darkness but shall have the light of life." Here's a condition. You have to follow Christ. It is limited then to those who follow Christ. You find over in verse 24 a similar saying. "I say therefore to you, that you shall die in your sins for unless you believe that I am He, you shall die in your sins." There is a hell and people are going there. In fact, Matthew 7 says, "Many are going there." And the only way to avoid going there, the only way to avoid dying in your sins, that is dying without a sacrifice for your sins, the only way to avoid that is to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.
How could Jesus say you could die in your sins if their sins had been paid for? They had not been paid for if they died without believing in Him. And there are other parts of John, if you go back to chapter 3, "God did not send His Son," verse 17, "to judge the world but that the world should be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged, but he who does not believe has been judged already because he's not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." There is a hell and people go there who don't believe in Jesus Christ. And then there are so many other places where you can see this very same emphasis made. I don't want to burden you with an endless list of them, but there are perhaps a couple of others maybe to think about. Matthew 22:13, "The king said to the servants, 'Bind him hand and foot and cast him into the outer darkness, in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'" A further description of horrific punishment and judgment. Chapter 25 verse 30, "Cast the worthless slave into outer darkness in the place where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." And then in a Pauline letter, 2 Thessalonians chapter 1, it talks about the coming of the Lord Jesus from heaven. Second Thessalonians 1:7, "With His mighty angels and flaming fire, dealing out retribution to those who do not know God, to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus and these will pay the penalty of eternal destruction away from the presence of the Lord and the glory of His power."
So the Bible promises there is a hell. The only way to avoid it is to not die in your sins. And to not die in your sins, you have to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. And if you don't, you're going to pay the penalty of eternal destruction. That proves that the atonement is limited. It does not apply universally. God did not intend to save everyone. He is God. He could have intended to save everyone. He could have saved everyone. He would have if that had been His intention. The atonement is limited.
Now we all have to accept that or be universalists. We know not everyone is going to heaven. In fact, it is a little flock, it is the few which if we were to hold on to this sort of evangelical idea means that the vast majority of people for whom Christ died and paid in full the penalty for their sins are going to go to hell. And that's just something very difficult to believe. So we do believe in a limited atonement. It is limited to those who believe.
How is it limited? That's the second point. Number one, is the atonement limited? Answer; yes. Number two, how is it limited? Well first of all, it's limited because not everybody is saved, only those who repent and believe. That's how it's limited. Only those who believe in Christ and confess Him as Lord are saved. Only those have their sins atoned for. It is limited to those who believe. That's how it's limited, okay? Very important that you grasp that. We'll come back to that.
Now here comes the key question. To whom is it limited? By whom? We know it's limited. We know how it's limited, it's limited to those who believe. It is only applicable to those who believe, "If you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord, believe in your heart God raised Him from the dead, you'll be saved." Now by whom is it limited? And the popular view would say this, "The atonement of Jesus is unlimited but sinners limit its application." And we're back to what we said before. It is a potential atonement, the actuality of which is limited by the sinner. Now we have to believe then that God has provided a sacrifice for sins in His Son that in and of itself is not sufficient. In and of itself is not actual. In and of itself is not real because the sinner can neutralize it. I don't mind believing God can limit the atonement, God does limit the atonement. But listen carefully to me. He limits the atonement as to its extent. You have to believe that because He didn't choose everybody and not everybody's going to heaven. And that's in the divine mind and that's the decree of God and that's the purpose of God and you have to come to grips with that.
I don't have any problem at all saying the atonement is limited. I don't have any problem at all saying how it's limited, it's limited to those who believe. And I have no problem saying and those who believe are those whom God grants faith and therefore the atonement is limited because God limited it. I'm much more comfortable with that than that sinners can limit the atonement that Christ has provided, or that the atonement that Christ has provided is wasted on the vast majority of people. If you say that God provided an atonement which is only potential, which only removes the barriers so that the sinner can be saved if he chooses to be, you know what you've done? You have said that God not only limited the atonement as to its extent, and you have to believe that, but He limited it as to its effect. Okay?
In other words, if you believe in an unlimited atonement, and you think you're one of those magnanimous people who believed Jesus died for everyone. Then by saying the atonement is unlimited as to extent, you have also said it is limited as to effect. It covers everybody but not potently. It covers everybody but not powerfully. A little while ago you sang a hymn, "Jesus...what?...paid it all," you believe that? Well, potentially. Did He pay it all potentially or actually? Did He actually bear in His body your sins on the cross or only potentially? If you decide that He did. If you're going to say that the extent of the atonement is unlimited, then the effect of the atonement is limited. If you're going to say that the extent of the atonement is limited, then you're going to say the effect of the atonement is unlimited. For those to whom it extends, it has no limits. So when you say you believe in a limited atonement or unlimited atonement...I believe in a limited atonement as to its extent. It is limited to those who believe who are those who are called, who are those who are chosen. But I believe it is unlimited as to its effect. For those to whom it is granted, it is a full atonement. Jesus did pay it all.
So, you know, these people who...who want to say, "Well, you know, we believe the atonement is unlimited." You say, "Wait a minute. You mean Jesus died for everybody in the whole world?" Yes. "Well you may think it's unlimited to its extent, but you have just confessed that it's limited as to its real effect because people are going to go to hell even though He died for them. What kind of an atonement is that? Even people who say, "We believe it's unlimited," don't believe that. They don't mean that. They know God limited it to those who believe and they believe that sinners limit it by making wrong choices. And then they believe there's some limits in the very atonement itself so that it really doesn't do the work of atonement, it just makes it possible for the sinner to activate it.
You know, you look at the Bible and it's pretty clear. The hymn writer got it right and that hymn is a pretty simple hymn, and I don't know what was in his mind when he wrote it but when he wrote, "Jesus paid it all," he meant that. What He did on the cross was not a partial atonement. What He did was not a potential atonement. It was not some kind of virtual atonement. It was a real actual atonement. It was limited in its extent to those who would believe who are the called and the chosen. But it was unlimited in its effect. For them it was a full and complete atonement. There is no such thing as an atonement by Jesus Christ on the cross that is less than a true and actual atonement. There is no such thing as some kind of potential atonement, some kind of half-way atonement. There's no such thing as Jesus paying in full for your sins and then you paying in full for your sins forever in hell. That diminishes the work of Christ, that mocks the work of Christ.
What are you saying? Your saying Jesus only partially activated this and it's up to the sinner to fully activate it? If Christ paid the sins of everybody and everybody doesn't go to heaven, then whatever He paid wasn't the full price. So we've got to change our hymn and say, "Jesus paid half, the rest is up to you." That would be a good line. "Jesus paid the first half, the rest is up to you." I just can't bring myself to believe that hell is full of millions of people whose sins were paid for in full by Christ on the cross. I cannot see the Father fully punishing the Son on the cross for the sins of people who will then be punished for those sins forever in hell. What is the point? What Christ did on the cross was a true and full and complete atonement for the sins of all who would believe and since no one can believe unless God grants them faith, it is the sins of those whom the Father has chosen to call to Himself.
You hear people say, "Well, you know, when you say the atonement is limited, people don't feel very special." Well, I'll tell you what. I don't feel very special if you say to me, "Christ died for you, He loves you just like He died for the millions in hell." That doesn't make me feel very special. That's kind of a hard way to do evangelism. Christ died on the cross for your sins and all the people in hell, too. That's not special. That's anything but special. You mean to tell me He paid for my sins and I'm paying for them forever? Then I'll tell you, whatever His payment was, it was bogus. You see, it's not biblical to limit the atonement as to its power. It's not biblical to limit the atonement as to its effectiveness. It's not biblical to limit the atonement as to its accomplishment. If He paid in full the penalty for your sins, you will receive that salvation. The atonement of Jesus Christ on the cross has to be in perfect harmony with the eternal decree. It is not biblical to limit the atonement by making it potential and not actual. It is not biblical to limit the atonement by the will of the unwilling and unable sinner. The atonement is limited by God to the elect. But it is unlimited as to its effect, for them it is a full and complete atonement.
Now the sum of it comes down to this. Is the death of Christ a work that potentially saves willing sinners or is it a work that actually provides salvation for unwilling sinners who by God's sovereign grace will be made willing? The only possible answer is that God provided a sacrifice in His Son, a true payment in full for the sins of all who would ever believe and all who would ever believe will believe because the Father will draw them and He will grant them repentance and faith and regeneration. Jesus' death then is to be understood as a full satisfaction to God's holy justice on behalf of all whom God will save.
I didn't invent this, this doctrine goes way back, back to the Reformation, back to John Owen, and even back to Charles Spurgeon. Listen to what Spurgeon said, "We are often told that we limit the atonement of Christ because we say that Christ has not made a satisfaction for all men or all men would be saved. Now our reply to this is that on the other hand our opponent's limited. We do not. The Arminians say Christ died for all men. Ask them what they mean by that. Did Christ die so as to secure the salvation of all men? They say no, certainly not. Or we ask them the next question, did Christ die so as to secure the salvation of any person in particular? They say no. They're obliged to say that if they're consistent. They say no. Christ has died that any man may be saved if...and then follow certain conditions of salvation."
"Now who is it that limits the salvation of Christ? Why you, you say that Christ did not die so as infallibly to secure the salvation of anybody. We beg your pardon. When you say we limit Christ's death, we say, 'No, my dear sir, it is you that do that.' We say Christ so died that He infallibly secured the salvation of a multitude that no man can number who through Christ's death not only may be saved but will be saved and cannot by any possibility run the hazzard of being anything but saved. You are welcome to your atonement," said Spurgeon. "You may keep it. We will never renounce ours for the sake of it."
The atonement is an actual atonement, not a potential one. It is a real atonement, not simply a barrier removed. And it is in behalf of all who would ever believe and since the sinner is unable and unwilling to believe apart from divine intervention and regeneration, it comes then down to the power of God based upon the decree of God.
Now, are you with me? I have listed here about fifty passages of Scripture, 5-0. And this is really the rich part of this. I just kind of set it up tonight and I'm going to leave it there because if I get into this, we'll be here till the Rapture of the church, I'm afraid. So you understand the issue and how to think it through reasonably and logically and fully. And next Sunday night, I want to take you down into the depths of what the Scripture has to say to support this marvelous view of an atonement that God has by His own sovereignty limited to those who believe but an atonement which in itself is unlimited to all for whom it is provided, salvation will be given in its fullness.
Now I want to add hastily to that, people say, "Well how do you know whether Christ died for you?" The answer is, "That whosoever will may come, and if you come and believe in the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, then the death of Christ was for you." And don't hold back, come to Christ. You know, there was a preacher in London when I was over there doing that conference and he pulled me aside and he said, "Do you actually encourage people to come to Christ?" And I said, "Yeah!." He said, "I find it so hard, I'm so restrained in my spirit." That's where your theology has plugged up in the wrong place. Look, we don't know who it is, other than those who have already come. We don't know who's out there to complete those for whom Christ paid a full atonement, so we plead with sinners. And I said to him, "Paul said we beg you in Christ-stead." Paul said, "I could wish myself accursed for my own people Israel that they would come to know the Savior, the Messiah." We plead with sinners. We take the gospel to the ends of the earth and we leave the secret things to the Lord but we follow the responsibility to call sinners to faith, knowing that those who come will have had a full atonement provided for them. And we're here to talk to you about that in our prayer room.
Father, thanks for a great day and the glory of our faith and our salvation coming more and more clear to us in those things we've learned today. And we bless Your name and thank You. Amen.
The Doctrine of Actual Atonement, Part 2
Selected Scriptures
Those of you who have been with us know we are tackling some of the more challenging and profound and difficult doctrines in the Scripture. And I trust we're having a wonderful time digging deeply into God's precious truth.
Last Sunday night we began to look at the subject, "For whom did Christ die?" Or, "The Nature of the Atonement." Or as I chose to call it, "The Doctrine of Actual Atonement." And I want to go back to that. If you weren't here last week, it really would be helpful for you to get the tape or the CD, whatever is best for you, and to listen to what I said and pair it up with what we're going to say tonight because you're going to get just a very abbreviated review of that important foundation.
These doctrines challenge us. They challenge us because even when we understand them the best we can from a biblical viewpoint, there is still a lot left over. There is still the inscrutable reality of the incomprehensible mind of God. And there are always going to be things that just don't quite resolve completely to us. Every doctrinal symphony is in some ways an unfinished symphony. Every major doctrine of the Scripture ends in an unresolved chord because we in our finite minds cannot in the end fully grasp the infinity of God's mind. But we do the best we can and we leave the rest to Him. And so in the end we entrust to Him what we do not understand and embrace with all our hearts what we do.
Certainly the doctrine of the extent of the atonement is one of those doctrines that takes us way beyond where we will be comfortable to go. It stretches our minds to the breaking point. It takes our theology out to the perimeter of our tolerances. And in the end it leaves us with some incomprehensible realities and that's as it should be. Since we are finite and He is infinite, there should be a vast distinction between what we can know and what God does know. But there are ways in which we can go to the edge of our comprehension and to the edge of biblical revelation to understand the greatness and the glory of the work of redemption.
Let's begin tonight by sort of working our way up to discussing the extent of the atonement. Jesus came into the world, He said, to seek and to save those who are lost, Luke 19:10. He came to seek and to save those who are lost. He was on a recovery mission. He came into this world to rescue sinners, sinners who were alive then who had lived already and would live in the future. His redemptive work on the cross reached back and reached forward and reached out to those in His own generation.
The coming of the Lord Jesus was the most perfect revelation of the eternal God ever. God was never so clearly manifest as He was in Jesus. The nature of God, the character of God, the purpose of God, the will of God was seen in Jesus. And so we conclude that God is by nature a Savior. The Apostle Paul loves to call Him, God our Savior. He is by nature a Savior and so Jesus comes into the world to seek and to save that which was lost to fulfill that part of God's nature which reaches out to redeem sinners. In order for God to save sinners, there had to be a sacrifice that paid the penalty for their sins. Jesus who is God came into the world, took on human form to offer Himself as that sacrifice, an unimaginable condescension, an undeserved act. On the cross Jesus died not under the wrath of men, really, but under the wrath of God. Not by the plans of the Romans and the Jews, but by the determined plan of God, predestined before the world began. And He bore the wrath of God and He bore separation from God for sinners, for all the sinners who would ever believe. And while it was a sacrifice for Christ to do this, it was a satisfying sacrifice. It was why He came to offer that sacrifice, to purchase God's chosen people, to purchase His own bride.
Turn in your Bible to Isaiah 53, this is a good place to start as we look at this sacrifice of Christ. Isaiah 53, and verse 4, this is the classic Old Testament section of Scripture which deals with the substitutionary death of Jesus in which He dies in the place of sinners. And Isaiah is inspired to write of His death in these words, starting in verse 4, "Surely our griefs He Himself bore, and our sorrows He carried. Yet we ourselves esteemed Him stricken, smitten of God and afflicted." That is to say that He was literally punished by God for our sins. Verse 5, "He was pierced through for our transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The chastening for our well-being fell upon Him and by His scourging we are healed. All of us like sheep have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way, but the Lord has caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him. He was oppressed and He was afflicted yet He did not open His mouth like a lamb that is led to slaughter."
I want you to go back for a minute to verse 4. "Our griefs, our sorrows." Verse 5, "Our transgressions, our iniquities, our well-being." "All of us," verse 6 , "each of us, but the Lord has caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him." Our, our, our, our, us, us, us, and the question comes, who is this? Whose sins did He bear? Whose transgressions? For whose iniquities was He crushed? For whose healings was He scourged? Whose iniquity was placed on Him?
Go down to verse 10. "The Lord was pleased to crush Him." It's an amazing statement. Because God is by nature a Savior and He finds His own satisfaction in saving sinners which means He is pleased to have His Son be the sacrifice that saves them. "The Lord was pleased to crush Him, putting Him to grief if He would render Himself as a guilt offering." "He will see His offspring." In other words, He is being crushed, He is being put to grief, He is being given as a guilt offering in the confidence that He will see His seed, His offspring. Verse 11 says, "As a result of the anguish of His soul, He will see it and be satisfied." God was pleased and Christ was satisfied because out of it would come His offspring, His seed.
And then verse 11 says, the end of the verse, "My servant," meaning Messiah, "will justify the many and He will bear their iniquities." And at the end of verse 12, "He Himself bore the sin of many and interceded for the transgressors." And the question is, "Who are the ours and the us's and the many?" It must be the offspring. Must be those that are the seed born out of that sacrifice because that is what pleased God and that is what satisfied Christ.
In the New Testament, it tells us in 1 Timothy 1:15 that the Lord Jesus came into the world to save sinners. Paul said that, that's his own testimony, "The Lord came into the world to save sinners." That's the great enterprise. God is an evangelist. God is a Savior. Christ then, God manifest, does a saving work. He came into the world to save sinners. And all those that He saves He then mandates to carry on this work. And according to the great commission, we are to go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. We are to go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I've commanded you and lo, I am with you always. We are ambassadors for Christ, begging people to be reconciled to God. We have been redeemed to be caught up in this great evangelistic enterprise. In Acts 1:8 as Jesus leaves this world, His final words, "You shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, you shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem and all Judea and Samaria, even to the remotest part of the earth." That's the last thing Jesus said on earth. "My Father is a Savior, I am a Savior and you are to pick up the glorious gospel of salvation and take it to the ends of the earth."
That's why we're here. Everything else is secondary, everything else is tertiary in the church. Everything else in a sense is less important. And I don't want anything to ever diminish that. That's why when you've been teaching on the doctrine of sovereign election and you've been teaching on the doctrine of absolute inability and unwillingness and you're teaching on the doctrine of the extent of the atonement, it is still absolutely consistent to follow all that up with four nights of evangelism on four Sundays because this is our mandate, this is why the church is here. We will worship better in heaven. We will serve the Lord better in heaven. We'll love each other better in heaven. In fact, we'll do all of that perfectly. But one thing we won't do in heaven is evangelize the lost. They won't be there. And God who weeps through the eyes of Jeremiah, and Jesus who weeps through His own eyes over the lost in Jerusalem, calls on us to weep over the impenitent and to go forth bearing precious seed with tears. God weeps over the impenitent. God weeps over the unbelieving. He has no pleasure in the death of the wicked. And He offers a legitimate and genuine call to sinners across the face of the world, both from the pages of Scripture and out of the mouths of all of the believers who go and take the message, a legitimate call to come and believe and be saved. That evangelistic mandate defines why the church is in the world. It's why we're here, to preach the gospel of salvation and reconciliation and forgiveness and heaven to the whole world. We are to beg people to come to salvation. And as I noted in Psalm 126:5, "We are to go forth with tears, bearing the precious seed of saving truth and reaping the harvest of faith with rejoicing." It was Jesus who said, "Come to Me all ye who labor and are heavy laden, I'll give you rest."
We are told to pray for the salvation of all people, 1 Timothy 2. We are told to set a godly example and to live our lives as shining lights so that men can see the power of Christ in us and be drawn to Him. We are told if we're going to name the name of Christ we ought to be like Him. We are told to proclaim the gospel and never to be ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it's the power of God to salvation. We are told to proclaim it to the Jew and to the Greek as well. And it is a legitimate offer, and a real offer. And every sinner on the planet is accountable for the response to that offer. And as we saw in our study this morning, every man has a stewardship that God has given him. It may be a stewardship of a law written in his heart, and a stewardship of his rational mind looking at the creation around him and being led to the knowledge of God. And if he follows the path as he should in obedience to that stewardship that God has given him, he will find the truth will open to him. Every man is accountable and no man has an excuse. And so we are mandated to take the gospel to the ends of the earth. But we know this, not everybody will repent and not everybody will believe, we know that. That has always been true, always.
There are numerable souls even now that have left this earth and are already out of the presence of God forever in eternal torment. That fact is inescapable. And they're going there every day that we live by the thousands, they die. There is an eternal hell and it will be continually filled with sinners until redemptive history is over, sinners who ignored conscience, sinners who ignored the Law written in their hearts, sinners who ignored that which was known of God that was placed in them, sinners who ignored the truth when they heard it, the Scripture when they read it, the gospel when it was preached to them, sinners who rejected the grace and goodness of God, sinners who refused to repent. And they all end up in hell and if they were given the choice while in hell to choose differently, they wouldn't do it. They showed no interest in God then, they will have no interest in Him now.
So we are called to a worldwide task and sinners are accountable for how they respond to the message at whatever level they receive it. Now as I will point out in the sermon next Sunday morning, there are degrees of punishment in hell. Not everyone's punishment will be equally severe in hell. That will depend upon how much truth you had, truth is dangerous. The more you have, the more culpable you are, the greater your guilt, the greater your punishment.
We shouldn't be surprised at this. Go back to Isaiah 6 while you're in Isaiah. Isaiah chapter 6 and here's a call of God on the prophet Isaiah. And in verse 8, the Lord asks a question and the question is this, "Who shall I send and who shall go for us?" The people of God are in serious trouble. They are in grave danger. The prior chapter, chapter 5, lays out the sins that were characteristic of God's people and judgment is coming, severe and deadly judgment is coming. It's described at the end of the fifth chapter. And God needs a messenger to warn, a messenger to call the people to repentance before the judgment comes. And the question is asked, "Whom shall I send and who will go for us?" Meaning the Trinity. And Isaiah responds, "Here am I, send me. I will go." This, of course, should be the response of every believer. "Who am I going to send to this world plummeting into judgment?" "I'll go."
And then the most bizarre statement. "And the Lord said, 'Go and tell this people, you go tell them, go and tell them about judgment, and tell them about grace and forgiveness and mercy as well. Tell them to turn from their sin. You go, you tell them.'" And then it says, "Keep on listening but don't proceed, keep on looking but don't understand. Render the hearts of this people insensitive, their ears dull, their eyes dim, lest they see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, return and be healed." What that is saying, and by the way, that passage is repeatedly quoted in the New Testament because it's the defining passage on the obstinacy of an unbelieving society, in particular Israel. Know this, He says to Isaiah, they're going to listen but not understand, they're going to see but not comprehend, they're going to be insensitive, dull of hearing, dim of sight. They won't get it. They won't return. They won't repent. They won't be healed. So know this, when you go.
I read somewhere, just yesterday, a little note that said, "There is a massive turning to Christ in the world today." Really? Where is that? I...I must be missing something.
And they asked the right question in verse 11. He said, "Lord, how long? I mean, why should I do that very long? How long should I do that, like a couple of weeks maybe?" No, just keep doing it till the cities are devastated and have no inhabitants and houses have no people and the land is desolate and the Lord has removed everybody far away and the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land. Just do it till the place is devastated. Do it till there's nobody left to do it to, just keep preaching... You say, "Wait a minute. This seems fruitless." No. Verse 13 is the key. "There will be a tenth portion in it." This is one of the very most tangled Hebrew constructions of any passage in the Old Testament, I'm not going to try to unscramble it for you. Simply to say, the Lord says there's a tenth, this is what we call the doctrine of the remnant, there's a tenth. There's a stump. And at the end of verse 13, "There is a holy seed that is that stump." There's a ...there's a group, there's a remnant, there's a seed. It's that same seed that the Messiah saw in Isaiah 53 and He could see His seed and His soul was satisfied. Do you think God has some mystery about who's going to be saved? Of course not. He knows. He knows it will be few. He knows it will be a remnant. He knows it will be only a portion, a holy seed. The word "holy" means set apart.
So we go, as Isaiah went. We go to the world and we go with the gospel and we know that most will not believe. And we could be very discouraged and say, "How long do I do that?" And the Lord says, "Just keep doing it because there is out there a seed already designated as holy." They're already in the purposes of God set apart for God. They are the elect who upon hearing the gospel will repent and will believe.
You remember Acts 13:48, "When the Gentiles heard this they began rejoicing and glorifying the Word of the Lord and as many as had been appointed to eternal life, believed." As many as had been appointed to eternal life believed. There is a remnant. There is a people appointed to eternal life.
In Acts 18 the Lord came to Paul in a vision. "Do not be afraid any longer," the Lord said, "Go on speaking, do not be silent. I am with you and no man will attack you in order to harm you." Listen to this, "For I have many people in this city." They weren't converted yet. They weren't converted yet. You go there, you preach as I have many of the holy seed already there. They're just waiting to hear.
So who will believe? Who will believe? Who will believe our report? Isaiah says. Who will be saved at the preaching of the gospel? All men are accountable and the offer is legitimate but who will be saved? And this launches us into our look at the doctrine of actual atonement or definite atonement or specific atonement or peculiar or particular atonement as it's all been called. Now we already know this, when we ask the question...who will believe and be saved? We just finished talking about the doctrine of absolute inability and unwillingness, sometimes called the doctrine of total depravity. And that doctrine says no sinner, and this is taught in the Bible, no sinner on his own can or will seek God, right? No sinner on his own will pursue the truth, will pursue righteousness, will come to reconciliation and salvation. He will not because he cannot. His condition as being dead in sin makes that impossible. And so the only ones who can come are those to whom God gives life and light and understanding and repentance and faith. And we also learned from the study before that that those to whom God gives that are those whom He has chosen to give that to. God chooses whom He will save and God saves whom He has chosen.
Clearly then salvation is all of God. It's His holy seed. It's His holy offspring in the language of Isaiah 53. It's His people he has already identified. Now, their salvation is not apart from their will, but it is in harmony with their will when their will is altered by the power of God. So that raises the question then...for whom did Christ die? For whom did He die? And we said last time, I'll just quickly review, most people in the church think that He died for everyone potentially and no one actually, right? He just died for everybody potentially, it's sort of out there, and you can pick it up if you want it or you don't, it's not going to be applicable to you. So He died for everybody potentially, and no one actually. Therefore the actualizing of the atonement depends upon the sinner deciding to actualize the atoning work of Jesus Christ on his own behalf. And if the sinner never believes, if he chooses never to receive Christ, then the death of Christ for Him remains an unrealized potential. So those who believe that, believe...now listen carefully...that the atonement of Christ is limited in its effect, okay? It's limited in its effect, they like to say they do not believe in a limited atonement, they believe in an unlimited atonement. That's not true. They believe in an atonement that is limited in its power, that is limited in its effect, that is limited in its impact to the will of the sinner. That's a very limited atonement. They believe that it is unlimited in its extent, that it extends to the whole of the human race, but it is very limited in its effect.
What the Bible teaches is just the opposite. It is limited in its extent to those whom God chooses and saves. And for them it is unlimited in its effect, in its power. It is then not a potential salvation for all, it is an actual salvation for the many. Who is our, and our, and us, and us, and the many, and the many for whom He died, for whom He actually bore sin's judgment? It is the holy seed. It is the holy offspring. It is the chosen of the Father. It is the bride of the Son. See, this changes everything. If you believe there's this sort of hanging sort of a potential atonement floating around the world and you just have to convince sinners to pick it up to take advantage of it, then evangelism takes on a completely different approach. It all becomes working on the will of the sinner to get him to actualize this only potential atonement.
And you have to ask yourself the question...who gets the credit for that one? Right? It doesn't sound like the way to glorify God. See, that's the idea that Jesus' atonement is unlimited in its extent but very limited in its effect. In fact, it isn't enough to save you. Is that amazing? Jesus dying on the cross, paying the penalty for your sin under that theology isn't enough to save you. You've got to do something to complete it which sounds to me like salvation by works. But how is the sinner going to do that when he's absolutely unable to do that and unwilling to do that? Dead in trespasses and sin, blinded by Satan, so we know not everybody's going to be saved. The atonement is limited in its extent and the question is, who limited it? Who limited it? God.
I know that's sometimes hard to take. But He did. There is hell and most people who live in this world end up there. That's how it is. The real hard doctrine is the doctrine of eternal punishment. If there were no hell, we wouldn't even need to debate these other issues, they'd be academic. But it's God who decides who He's going to save and who chose them before the foundation of the world.
I just can't look at the cross and see Jesus at the very end of the cross looking up and saying, "It is started." What? "It is potential." That's not what He said, is it? Was the death of Christ a full and complete payment to God satisfying His just wrath for some particular chosen people? Or was it a potential for nobody? An actual for nobody, a potential for everybody.
Let's look at the Scripture and see how to understand that. We only have a little bit of time. This is going to be a survey kind of look. We have to...we have to look at some terms. Okay, world...let's take world. Everybody comes and says, "Wait a minute, wait a minute, what about the world, what about the world?" Let me help you with that, okay? It's going to be like those old sword drills, Bible drills that you had when you were a kid, you've got to move fast with me. We've heard the world mentioned, when we hear the word world we think the world means everybody who ever lived. That's not biblical. John 1:9, "There was the true light which coming into the world enlightens every man." What does that mean? Coming into the world, what does that mean? Does that mean He came to every human being on the face of the earth? No, it just means He came in to the human realm. He was in the world. He was in the human realm. "And the world was made through Him, and the world didn't know Him." World is just a term for humanity, the created world. He was in the world, God in human flesh. There's nothing about every single individual on the planet being necessarily involved in that word, just the created order, just humanity.
So here you see the word world, immediately has to be qualified. John 1:29, "The next day he saw Jesus coming to him and he said, 'Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of...what?...the world.'" Now wait a minute, we have to qualify that immediately, don't we? If He took away the sin of the world, what? Everybody would be...what?...saved. They'd all have their sin taken away. So immediately we have to qualify the word world. And how do you qualify it? "He came into this human realm, He came into this created order, He came to humanity to take away sin." And in the future, of course, it will be removed completely in the New Heaven and the New Earth.
But you will notice that this is clearly limited. He didn't come to take away the sin of everybody. Go back to verse 11, "He came to His own and those who were His own did not receive Him...verse 12...but as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God even to those who believe in His name." So taking away the sin of the world is then qualified by whoever believed in Him. They were the only ones who had the right to be forgiven and become children of God. So world is just a generic term meaning humanity, the created order. And it has to be qualified.
In John chapter 3, again verse 16, "God so loved the world," and that's something we're going to talk about in January, the love of God and how far and how wide and how high and how deep is it. God so loved the world. What does that mean? Humanity. "He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life, for God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world but that the world should be saved through Him." Well immediately you know the world has to be qualified. If you don't qualify it, we're all going to come out universalists here, with everybody being saved. And we know that can't be true because the Bible is so clear on judgment.
In John chapter 4, all it means in John 3 is He loved humanity, He loved mankind. He loved people from all tribes and tongues and nations. He loved and in a very general sense, the sense of common grace and the offer of the gospel and compassion He shows love to the world. But His saving love for the world is limited to those in the world, the realm of humanity who believe. "God so loved the world He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes."
John 4:42, again it's the same thing. It says, "It's no longer because of what you said that we believe for we have heard for ourselves and know that this one is indeed the Savior of the world." It doesn't say He's the potential Savior of the world, He is the Savior of the world. He is the Savior of the world unqualified so therefore the world has to be qualified, you can't qualify the word Savior. He is the...well, potential Savior. You're trying to protect the universal concept of world and you wind up limiting the Savior. It really points out the picture, doesn't it? Either you're going to limit the effect of the saving work of Christ, or you're going to limit the extent of it, one of the two. He is the Savior of the world in this sense, He's the only Savior this world will ever have. He's the only Savior the human race will ever know. The world has no other Savior. And what's really important to note in all the way through the gospel of John, whenever you read this, "the Savior of the world," "God so loved the world," "He was in the world," etc., keep in mind that John is addressing an environment of Jewish anti-Gentile racism. And the idea that the Messiah is for the world was a foreign idea, no pun intended, it was a revolutionary idea.
In John 6:33, again the same emphasis, "The bread of God is that which comes down out of heaven and gives life to the world." To the world...what part of the world? Verse 35, "He who comes to Me shall not hunger, he who believes in Me shall never thirst." You're going to have life if you come and you believe from whatever nation on this planet. He's the Savior of the world, 1 John 4:14 says the same thing in the sense that it's not limited to the Jews. But it is limited. It's limited always to those who believe. John 6:33 we just read, and John 6:51 follows it up, "I am the living bread that came down out of heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he shall live forever. And the bread also that I shall give for the life of the world is My flesh." He gives His life for the world, but who in the world? It says in the same verse, "Whoever eats the bread will live forever." It's always qualified by believing, by believing. You see it again, it's all through the gospel of John. John chapter 12 verse 47 and 48, again always needing to be qualified, "If anyone hears My saying though he keep them, I do judge him, I didn't come to judge the world but to save the world." Obviously this does not mean that He's going to save every human being whoever lives, it does mean that He is going to extend His salvation without regard for race or color or sex across this planet, humanity in general.
Look at chapter 14 verse 22, this is just another illustration of how you always have to qualify the world. Judas in John 14:22, "Judas, not Iscariot, said, 'Lord, what then has happened that You're going to disclose Yourself to us and not the world?'" What do you think Judas meant by that? What did he mean that You're going to disclose Yourself to us and not to the world? He certainly didn't mean every human being on the planet. The wider world, the wider realm of humanity outside this narrow group, the general public, it means there. And Jesus even understood His own limitations on the word world. Look at John 17, very important, John 17, Jesus is praying and He prays for, verse 6, the men You gave Me out of the world. The men You gave Me out of the world I pray for them, they were Thine, they were and Thou gavest them to Me and they've kept Thy Word. And then go down to verse 9, "I ask on their behalf, I do not ask on behalf of the world." There you have Jesus not interceding for the world but for the men whom God gave Him out of the world. Again you have to qualify and Jesus Himself there makes that qualification.
In verse 15 of John 17, He prays for His own and says, "I ask that You not take them out of the world, but keep them from the evil one." And there He understands the world as this human enterprise with all its sin. In verse 16 He says, "They're not of the world." Verse 18, "You sent Me into the world and I sent them into the world. But I don't pray for the world, I just pray for those You've given Me out of the world." Jesus even knew there were qualifications on the use of the word world, just general, beyond Israel, across all races and languages. The world is always qualified, never is there an occasion when we can dogmatically say it means every human being whoever lived.
In fact, in John 12, I can't resist this, just thought of it, John 12:19. The Pharisees were getting more and more concerned about Jesus so in John 12:19 it says, "The Pharisees therefore said to one another, 'You see that you're not doing any good. Look the world has gone after Him.'" Well what do you think they meant by that? Every human being that ever lived? No, it's always qualified. In Luke 9:25 Jesus says, "What shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world," well that's qualified, no man is going to own the whole world.
So we simply in the context understand that the term world is to get us beyond the provincialism the narrowness and the racism of Judaism to get us to the extent of the atonement stretching across this earth in all times and all nations. Paul in Romans 11:15 says that the rejection of Israel has brought about the reconciliation of the world. And again, Paul doesn't believe for a moment that that means that every single person whoever lived will be reconciled to God. What he means is that Israel's rejection being set aside, the church is grafted in and the church is made up of Jew and Gentile. The Jews had a hard time with this. That's why the Apostles had to sort of shock them with the fact that the Lord was doing a work among the Gentiles. You remember the book of Acts? While Peter was still speaking in Acts 10, the Holy Spirit fell on Cornelius, Gentiles, and all the circumcised believers who had come with Peter were amazed because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. Well that was part of that same provincialism. And the gospel was never intended to be limited to Israel. The same is in the fifteenth chapter of Acts verses 6 and following. Verse 7, we can pick it up. "Peter stood and said, 'Brethren, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe and God who knows the heart bore witness to them, giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith." It's a hard pill for the Jews to swallow, that the gospel stretched outside Judaism to humanity from every tongue and tribe and people and nation.
So we look at the term world and we always qualify it. There's another passage, two more that need our brief attention. I'm just going to comment briefly. First John 2, 1 John 2, "Jesus Christ the righteous," verse 1, verse 2, "He Himself is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but also for those of the whole world." What is that saying? That He is a propitiation not only for our sins, again this is very Jewish in its context. But for the whole world. It's making the same point that John made over and over and over again, the same point that they made in the book of Acts, the same point that Paul makes in Romans 11. That the gospel is not limited to the Jews. Propitiation, by the way, is a very strong word, hilasmos in the Greek. And propitiation means the actual satisfying of God's just wrath. It's not a potential, it's an actual word. It..it...it could be translated placated, or satisfied. He Himself is the satisfaction, He is the placation, He propitiates God, satisfies God, placates God's anger for our sins. But not just ours, as the inside people, but the whole world. That is to say there is no other propitiation for people in any other nation than the one who is the propitiation for us. If this meant that He was actually a satisfaction for every person who ever lived, then the word is way too strong to mean anything potential. It would have to mean actual because it's a satisfaction, God was satisfied with the sacrifice on their behalf. Nothing is left out. And Jesus' death, dear one, was a satisfaction. He was the sacrificial lamb on the ultimate day of atonement whose blood sprinkled before God was a true satisfaction. Propitiation is too strong a word to mean something potential because propitiation means it turns God's wrath away forever. And not just for us but for any Gentile or anyone else who believes.
And in 2 Corinthians chapter 5, and I'm just going to cover this one because I know if I don't you'll come up and ask me about them, 2 Corinthians 5:19. "God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself." And again you say, "Well okay, reconciling the world. People always know...didn't He reconcile the whole world?" Well what do you mean by the world? It always has to be qualified otherwise you end up, as I said, a universalist and then what do you do with everybody that's being sent to hell? God is reconciling the world to Himself. And what does it mean? Listen to this, "Not counting their trespasses against them." That's not a potential anything, that's an actual. God is reconciling, God is not making reconciliation possible, God is not removing a barrier to reconciliation, God is not giving, you know, the eight-tenths of the deal and telling the sinner to take the next two steps. He is reconciling to Himself in Christ, that is in the death of Christ, the world not counting their trespasses against them. And let me tell you, my friend, not having your trespasses counted against you means that He bore your transgression in full and you are under no condemnation. And that is not a potential salvation, that is an actual salvation. Whoever the world is here, it is the ones who no longer have their trespasses counted against them. It is those who are, verse 17, new creatures in Christ. It is those in verse 21 for whom He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf. Whose behalf? Those who were reconciled to God that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. There's no such thing in the Bible as a potential atonement. It simply means that there are no racial limits, there are no ethnic limits. These passages regarding the world are all qualified. It's just humanity, the human world, this realm, not every single individual who ever lives. You know, that has been sold to us through the years. Christ did not pay in full, He did not reconcile, He did not satisfy God fully so that God no longer counts trespasses against every human being in the world. If that were true that is an actual salvation and there can be no hell cause there can't be any punishment. That's...then God would be...what?..not just but...what?...unjust.
Well you say, "Well the Bible says all, the Bible says all." I know it says all, yeah it says all. Want to look at some "alls"? Romans 5, let's look at some alls. Just give me a few more minutes and we'll get there, I only have about 45 passages here. We can cut it off anywhere and we'll get it some other time. But Romans 5:18, "So then," this is another passage important, "So then through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men." That one transgression was Adam, right? And that did effect everybody. "Even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men." Well if you're not careful there, if you drive the parallel in the wrong direction, you're going to come out with this, "Well everybody was affected by Adam's sin and became sinners, therefore everybody is affected by Christ's righteous work and becomes righteous." The problem with that is that's not true.
There's only one illustration being made here. It's simply this. The argument is coming up, Paul is talking about the impact of the work of Christ, how that the work of Christ is the redeeming work of all who believe. And the question that comes up in the mind of the reader is going to be, "How can one man's act have such a great effect? How can the act of one man have such massive implications?" And so he simply makes the parallel. "Look, by one man's sin, everybody died. Everybody who died died. And by one man's righteousness, everybody who became righteous became righteous." He even changes his terminology in verse 19 where he says, "Just to make sure we don't think the 'all' is inclusive, as through the one man's disobedience many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of one, many will be made righteous." And I think he puts that in there just to back us off the wrong understanding of verse 18 which would make everybody saved and he...whoa, that's not what I'm trying to say, let's use the word many so we don't get mixed up here. We're just trying to illustrate the point that one man's work, one man's deed effects all who proceed from that one man. So that is all only in the appropriate sense, qualified again in the context.
Go to chapter 8 of Romans verse 32. Here's all again. "He who did not spare His own Son but delivered Him up for us all." Who's the all here? Christ was delivered up for us all. Now some people will say, "Well He was delivered up for everybody in the whole world." That's not...is that who he's talking about here? Is that Paul's us?
Well let's go back to verse 31, just back up one. "If God is for us, who is against us?" Now who is the us there? Everybody in the whole world, is God for everybody in the whole world? We have to qualify us. Well who is the us that God is for? I'll tell you who it is, verse 29, "Whoever He predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, whoever He predestined, verse 30, He called, whoever He called He justified, whoever He justified, these He also glorified and if God is for us, who can be against us." It's the us of those who were predestined and called and justified and glorified. To put it another way, verse 33, "Who will bring a charge against God's elect?" It is the elect, we are the us all.
Second Corinthians chapter 5...2 Corinthians chapter 5 verse 14, and here's language very much like Romans 5, just so you can compare it, 2 Corinthians 5, we were there in the little few verses down, I want to go back to 14 and 15, "The love of Christ controls us having concluded that one died for all, therefore all died. And He died for all that they who live shall no longer live for themselves but for Him who died and rose again on their behalf." Now the all is qualified. Now just follow this carefully. The love of Christ controls us, having concluded that one died for all. People say, "Oh, He died for all, He died for the whole world, every single person in the whole world. He died for them all?" No. He died for all, therefore all died. The all He died for died. What is that? Well when you came to Christ, do you remember you died, is that not true? "I am crucified...what?...with Christ." In Him you die. So He died for all therefore all died. He died for the all who died in Him. Verse 15, He died for all and who are the all? They who live. He died for those who died and live in Him. It was for them that He died and arose again, end of verse 15, on their behalf...on their behalf.
You could look at the word many, if we had time, it has some interesting usages and you will find a number of references to the word many. We already saw one in Romans 5, just so you can compare it, saying that the Lord died not for all, but for many. And that's another way to get to the same point, all meaning all in the broad sense across the world, many meaning less than everyone. In Hebrews 9, "Christ also having been offered once to bear the sins of many." Wow, offered to bear the sins of many. You don't want to do too much with these words other than to understand in the context how they are always qualified.
Listen to Matthew 20:28, "The Son of Man didn't come to be served, but to serve and give His life a ransom for many...for many." Who are the many? All who would believe. He actually was a ransom. He actually was a satisfaction. He actually provided an expiation. He actually achieved an atonement for those who would believe. To put it in the angelic language, it goes like this, the angel says, "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for that which has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit, and she will bear a Son and you shall call His name Jesus...listen...for it is He who will save...who?...His people from their sins." The Bible teaches nowhere a potential salvation. He saves His people from their sins. That's what He will do when He comes, it will be a real salvation for His people. John 10:11, "I am the Good Shepherd, the Good Shepherd lays down His life for the sheep and I know My own sheep. I am the Good Shepherd, I know My own, My own know Me. I lay down My life for the sheep."
In chapter 11 of John's gospel and verse 50, "It is expedient for you that one man should die for the people and that the whole nation should not perish," so says Caiaphas. "Now this he did not say on his own initiative but being high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for the nation...listen to this...and not for the nation only but that He might also gather together into one the children of God who were scattered abroad." Wow, what a statement! Get that? Jesus died, Jesus died not just for Jews, but to gather into one body the children of God scattered all over the world. That's who He died for.
In Ephesians chapter 5, just a couple more. "Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved...what?...the church and gave Himself up for her that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the Word that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory." He paid the price for His bride, His church. He redeemed her. It wasn't a redemption of nobody in particular, it was a redemption of His own redeemed church. It was a particular redemption. He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world. He predestined us. In Him we have redemption, Ephesians 1:7. We have the forgiveness of our trespasses according to the riches of His grace which he lavished on us. We are, I love this, verse 14 of Ephesians 1, "God's own possession." It says the redemption of God's own possession, a people of His own possession. Titus 2:13, "We look for the blessed hope, and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ...I love this...who gave Himself for us that He might redeem us and purify for Himself a people for His own possession." And who was that people? The people whom God chose before the foundation of the world and gave to the Son as His bride. Peter says, "He bore our sins in His own body," 1 Peter 2:24. Peter says, "Christ died for sin once for all, the just for the unjust in order that He might bring us to God." He didn't die to potentially bring people to God, He died to bring us to God. He died to satisfy God. He died to redeem the holy seed, the holy offspring.
One other text, that's it. One other one, because I know you'll ask me. Hebrews 10:29, it's a clarification really. Hebrews 10:29, "How much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who will trample underfoot the Son of God and regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which He was sanctified." Some people say, "Well wait a minute, that says right there that some people who are going to be punished, some people who trample underfoot the Son of God and regard as unclean the very blood of His covenant are said to be sanctified."
Can I help you with that verse? Take out your little pen and put just a little line above the "h" that turns it into a capital H. It's not talking about sinners being sanctified, it's talking about Christ by which He was sanctified, trampling underfoot the Son of God and regarding as unclean the blood of the covenant by which He was set apart as the covenant sacrifice."
Well, somebody could throw in a verse like 2 Peter 2:1 and say, "Wait a minute, it says of those people there who were apostate that they denied the Master who bought them." Sure, there's a sarcasm there, they claimed to be true believers. They claimed to be true teachers. They infiltrated the church as false teachers and Peter says, "You now have denied the Master who bought you." We know the Master didn't pay the price for damnable heretics.
So how do we summarize this? The death of Christ was a real, true actual satisfaction of divine justice. It was a true payment and a true atonement in full, actually not potentially, paid to God by Christ on behalf of all who would ever believe because they were chosen and redeemed by the power of God. The death of Christ was indefinite, particular, specific and actual on behalf of God's chosen people, limited in extent by the sovereign purposes of God, but unlimited in effect, for all for whom it was rendered it is fully in force, or will be in each individual life. It is the work of God. It is the work of Christ who accomplished redemption, not to make redemption possible to then be finally accomplished by the sinner. Christ procured salvation for all whom God would call and justify. Sinners do not limit the atonement, God does. Jesus did actually take the penalty in full for all who would ever believe.
What does that mean to you? Well for one, you ought to rejoice because the price was paid in full for you. You don't have to activate it. You're a trophy of God's divine grace. Secondly, go out and evangelize the lost with joy knowing that there's a holy seed out there for Christ has already paid the price for their sins and it's our joy and our privilege to be our instruments to reach them.
Father, thank You for our time tonight and may we rejoice in every sense in the greatness of our salvation, in Christ's name. Amen.
